PSYCH 3310 Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers Essay

PSYCH 3310 Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers Essay

PSYCH 3310_Research paper- 04 to be done

Please follow the guidelines and instructions; paper should be checked on unicheck web.

Paper Assignment Guidelines

The goal of the four paper assignments you will write this semester is to strengthen your library skills, critical thinking and analytical skills, and knowledge of the key issues within the developmental psychology literature. Responses to each PSYCH 3310 Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers Essay paper assignment should not be based on your opinion but based on the information in your textbook and peer-reviewed research. Each paper assignment should be 4 pages long, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman Font and in APA Format (abstract is not necessary). Up to 10 additional points will be deducted from papers that are not in APA formatting and/or have grammatical errors that affect readability.  In addition to any sources that are provided within the paper assignment, for each assignment you will be responsible for finding three additional peer-reviewed sources to help you develop and support your response. When writing your paper assignments, please remember that your point of view should be informed and supported by peer-reviewed research. To receive credit for your work please provide a reference page in APA format for all the sources you used in your paper assignment. The reference page does not count toward the page requirement for paper assignments. To assist you in writing your paper assignments, please review the ‘Paper Assignment Help’ pdf file on Canvas and the grading rubric that is posted on Canvas and found at the end of the instructions for each paper assignment (the rubric is the same for all paper assignments).

           BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Note: All paper assignments that you complete in this course will be processed using the anti-plagiarism software, UniCheck. This software is integrated with Canvas and will give you a similarity score for your assignments that will be visible to both you and your professor. If there are instances where your writing is similar to, or matches against, a source within the database, it will be flag for your professor to review. Any work that is submitted that has a similarity score over 25% will not be graded and will receive a zero. You can see your similarity score as soon as you submit your assignment. In the event that your similarity score is too high, you may revise your document and resubmit your assignment up until the assignment is due.

Paper Assignment #4 (50 pts)

Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers

Throughout social media websites and apps, there are individuals who create content about various aspects of human development such as physical health, nutrition, parenting, emotional wellbeing, and so much more. On Instagram, some popular examples are @takingcarababies, @biglittlefeelings, and @milestones.and.motherhood. Some of these individuals are professionally qualified to discuss these topics; they earned degrees, licenses, and work in the field. Others are not qualified and make claims based on personal experience and anecdotal evidence.  For this paper assignment, you will evaluate the content of three different social media influencers and compare and contrast what they say about their topic and what the research says. To be successful on this assignment, do the following:

  • Find three social media influencers who create content about an aspect of human development. To be considered an “influencer” they must have over 100,000 followers and post content to Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok regularly. Make sure to provide their social media handle.
  • Evaluate each influencers content over the past two weeks. Provide links and/or screenshots of stories, captions, and other content to use throughout your paper. Then answer the following questions:

o          What aspect of human development does this person post about?

o          Are they qualified in any way to post about this subject? If so, what makes them qualified?

o          Pick two specific posts over the past two weeks for each influencer and evaluate the accuracy of the information they provided to their followers? Is it correct, is it complete? Use peer-reviewed research articles to help support your evaluation.

Paper Assignment Rubric

Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion.

Excellent         Good   Okay   Needs Improvement

Explanation of issues

(5 pts)  Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. (5 pts)        Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. (4 pts)  Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown. (3 pts)            Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description. (2 pts)

 

 

Evidence

(10 pts)

Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion       Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, peer-reviewed, relevant sources to develop ideas with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis of the issue. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly. (10 pts)

Demonstrates consistent use of peer-reviewed, relevant sources to support ideas with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning. (8 pts)

Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning. (6 pts)   Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the writing. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.

Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question. (4 pts)

Sources

(5 pts)  Number of required peer-reviewed sources is met (5 pts)            Missing one required peer-reviewed source. (4 pts)  Missing two required peer-reviewed sources. (3 pts)  Missing more than three peer-reviewed sources. (2 pts)

Influence of context and assumptions

(10 pts)

Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. (10 pts) Identifies own and others’ assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position. (8 pts)           Questions some assumptions.  Identifies several relevant contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa). (6 pts)    Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position. (4 pts)

Student’s position—perspective, thesis/hypothesis

(10 pts)            Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue.

Limits of position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged.

Others’ points of view are synthesized within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). (10 pts)     Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others’ points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). (8 pts)       Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) acknowledges different sides of an issue. (6 pts)            Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious. (4 pts)

Conclusions and related outcomes—implications and consequences

(10 pts)            Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. (10 pts)            Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. (8 pts)    Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. (6 pts)   Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified. (4 pts) PSYCH 3310 Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers Essay

 

Paper Assignment Guidelines

 The goal of the four paper assignments you will write this semester is to strengthen your library skills, critical thinking and analytical skills, and knowledge of the key issues within the developmental psychology literature. Responses to each paper assignment should not be based on your opinion but based on the information in your textbook and peer-reviewed research. Each paper assignment should be 4 pages long, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman Font and in APA Format (abstract is not necessary). Up to 10 additional points will be deducted from papers that are not in APA formatting and/or have grammatical errors that affect readability.  In addition to any sources that are provided within the paper assignment, for each assignment you will be responsible for finding three additional peer-reviewed sources to help you develop and support your response. When writing your paper assignments, please remember that your point of view should be informed and supported by peer-reviewed research. To receive credit for your work please provide a reference page in APA format for all the sources you used in your paper assignment. The reference page does not count toward the page requirement for paper assignments. To assist you in writing your paper assignments, please review the ‘Paper Assignment Help’ pdf file on Canvas and the grading rubric that is posted on Canvas and found at the end of the instructions for each paper assignment (the rubric is the same for all PSYCH 3310 Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers Essay paper assignments).

 

Note: All paper assignments that you complete in this course will be processed using the anti-plagiarism software, UniCheck. This software is integrated with Canvas and will give you a similarity score for your assignments that will be visible to both you and your professor. If there are instances where your writing is similar to, or matches against, a source within the database, it will be flag for your professor to review. Any work that is submitted that has a similarity score over 25% will not be graded and will receive a zero. You can see your similarity score as soon as you submit your assignment. In the event that your similarity score is too high, you may revise your document and resubmit your assignment up until the assignment is due.

 

Paper Assignment #4 (50 pts)

 

Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers

 

Throughout social media websites and apps, there are individuals who create content about various aspects of human development such as physical health, nutrition, parenting, emotional wellbeing, and so much more. On Instagram, some popular examples are …. Some of these individuals are professionally qualified to discuss these topics; they earned degrees, licenses, and work in the field. Others are not qualified and make claims based on personal experience and anecdotal evidence.  For this paper assignment, you will evaluate the content of three different social media influencers and compare and contrast what they say about their topic and what the research says. To be successful on this assignment, do the following:

  • Find three social media influencers who create content about an aspect of human development. To be considered an “influencer” they must have over 100,000 followers and post content to FaceBook, Instagram, or TikTok regularly. Make sure to provide their social media handle.
  • Evaluate each influencers content over the past two weeks. Provide links and/or screenshots of stories, captions, and other content to use throughout your paper. Then answer the following questions:
    • What aspect of human development does this person post about?
    • Are they qualified in any way to post about this subject? If so, what makes them qualified?
    • PSYCH 3310 Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers Essay
    • Pick two specific posts over the past two weeks for each influencer and evaluate the accuracy of the information they provided to their followers? Is it correct, is it complete? Use peer-reviewed research articles to help support your evaluation.

 

Paper Assignment Rubric

Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion.

  Excellent Good Okay Needs Improvement
Explanation of issues

(5 pts)

Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. (5 pts) Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. (4 pts) PSYCH 3310 Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers Essay Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown. (3 pts) Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description. (2 pts)
Evidence

(10 pts)

Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion

Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, peer-reviewed, relevant sources to develop ideas with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis of the issue. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly. (10 pts)

 

Demonstrates consistent use of peer-reviewed, relevant sources to support ideas with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning. (8 pts)

 

Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning. (6 pts) Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the writing. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.

Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question. (4 pts)

Sources

(5 pts)

Number of required peer-reviewed sources is met (5 pts) Missing one required peer-reviewed source. (4 pts) Missing two required peer-reviewed sources. (3 pts) Missing more than three peer-reviewed sources. (2 pts)
Influence of context and assumptions

(10 pts)

 

Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. (10 pts) Identifies own and others’ assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position. (8 pts) Questions some assumptions.  Identifies several relevant contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa). (6 pts) Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position. (4 pts)
Student’s positionperspective, thesis/hypothesis

(10 pts)

Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue.

Limits of position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged.

Others’ points of view are synthesized within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). (10 pts)

PSYCH 3310 Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers Essay Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others’ points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). (8 pts) Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) acknowledges different sides of an issue. (6 pts) Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious. (4 pts)
Conclusions and related outcomesimplications and consequences

(10 pts)

Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. (10 pts) Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. (8 pts) Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. (6 pts) Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified. (4 pts)

PSYCH 3310 Evaluating the Content of Social Media Influencers Essay